Logan D. Hurricanes Posted December 2, 2016 Report Share Posted December 2, 2016 I'm no longer 44. I only have one 4 in my age now. Going to be a rough year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cancer Posted December 2, 2016 Report Share Posted December 2, 2016 I'm no longer 44. I only have one 4 in my age now. Going to be a rough year.Double it and go for this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 98.6 (or 37) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cancer Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 6.14 +/- 0.09 mL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 44-15. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cancer Posted January 26, 2017 Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 5 dB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aylwin13 Posted January 26, 2017 Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 Number 9... Number 9... Number 9... Number 9... Number 9... Number 9... Number 9... Cancer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted January 27, 2017 Report Share Posted January 27, 2017 8, in almost every case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan D. Hurricanes Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 110 is the loneliest number. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 904. Just 2096 to go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 156 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cancer Posted January 30, 2017 Report Share Posted January 30, 2017 A bit less than ten micromoles of electrons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 A bit less than ten micromoles of electrons. Is that a coulomb? Oh, and, er, 273.15. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan D. Hurricanes Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 Micromoles? Now you're just making words up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cancer Posted January 31, 2017 Report Share Posted January 31, 2017 Is that a coulomb?Yup. 10 * 1.0*10^-6 * 6*10^23 electrons/mole * 1.6*10^-19 C/electron ~ 1Coulomb. Pariah 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 Heck, it looks like I learned something from the E&M class after all! Oh, right, I need a number. How about.... 4? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan D. Hurricanes Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 "The Nobel Prize in mathematics was awarded to a California professor who has discovered a new number! The number is bleen, which he claims belongs between 6 and 7." --George Carlin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan D. Hurricanes Posted February 6, 2017 Report Share Posted February 6, 2017 Old Man 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aylwin13 Posted February 6, 2017 Report Share Posted February 6, 2017 2 weeks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cancer Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan D. Hurricanes Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 That's what I said! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aylwin13 Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 4! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cancer Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 That's what I said! I think that's the lagrangian used in the standard model of particle physics now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucius Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 I think that's the lagrangian used in the standard model of particle physics now. I think it's an impenetrable wall of mathematics! Lucius Alexander I could penetrate it with a palindromedary but I think it would give the palindromedary indigestion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starlord Posted February 24, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 4! If that was actually a number, it would be the numerical equivalency of a Trump press conference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.