Cancer Posted June 27, 2016 Report Share Posted June 27, 2016 (I've posted this sort of thing before, many moons ago.) Assuming average adult body mass (for the European mole, Talpa europaea) of about 85 grams, a mole of moles is about 2.6 × 10-8 solar masses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cancer Posted August 5, 2016 Report Share Posted August 5, 2016 Today was 16/8/4, in a certain format. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan D. Hurricanes Posted August 5, 2016 Report Share Posted August 5, 2016 Good format. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starlord Posted August 5, 2016 Author Report Share Posted August 5, 2016 Today was 16/8/4, in a certain format. What the hell, man! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza Posted August 5, 2016 Report Share Posted August 5, 2016 Today was 16/8/4, in a certain format. Or 4/8/16 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burrito Boy Posted August 5, 2016 Report Share Posted August 5, 2016 23 Skidoo! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cancer Posted August 6, 2016 Report Share Posted August 6, 2016 54 40 or fight! Old Man 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cancer Posted August 7, 2016 Report Share Posted August 7, 2016 40.56 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan D. Hurricanes Posted August 7, 2016 Report Share Posted August 7, 2016 29.678927 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan D. Hurricanes Posted August 7, 2016 Report Share Posted August 7, 2016 -82.346985 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cancer Posted August 7, 2016 Report Share Posted August 7, 2016 This one deserves either I or 1917, while being a fine bunch of numbers itself. link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burrito Boy Posted August 9, 2016 Report Share Posted August 9, 2016 154.6072 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted August 10, 2016 Report Share Posted August 10, 2016 Has anyone nominated 4 yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L. Marcus Posted August 10, 2016 Report Share Posted August 10, 2016 Not that I've seen. I'd better do it too, so it takes. Four. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starlord Posted August 10, 2016 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2016 Pariah and L. Marcus 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L. Marcus Posted August 10, 2016 Report Share Posted August 10, 2016 But ye'r durn pretty! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted August 26, 2016 Report Share Posted August 26, 2016 9,000,000,000 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starlord Posted August 26, 2016 Author Report Share Posted August 26, 2016 9,000,000,000 See, what we can do when we try, people? 9,000,000,000. A good solid number. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger Posted August 26, 2016 Report Share Posted August 26, 2016 -3.14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted August 26, 2016 Report Share Posted August 26, 2016 See, what we can do when we try, people? 9,000,000,000. A good solid number. Of course, it's meaningless without the units. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cancer Posted August 26, 2016 Report Share Posted August 26, 2016 Well, there are meaningful dimensionless quantities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan D. Hurricanes Posted August 26, 2016 Report Share Posted August 26, 2016 9,000,000,000 + 4 Pariah 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted August 26, 2016 Report Share Posted August 26, 2016 Well, there are meaningful dimensionless quantities. That's true, on occasion. (In my specific case, the number should be 9 x 109 N·m2/C2) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza Posted August 26, 2016 Report Share Posted August 26, 2016 Well, there are meaningful dimensionless qualities too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pariah Posted August 26, 2016 Report Share Posted August 26, 2016 That's a pretty shallow statement, don't you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.