Lord Liaden Posted November 3, 2016 Report Share Posted November 3, 2016 If someone had submitted this campaign as a movie script a few years ago, every studio would have rejected it as too ludicrous for an audience to believe. But who in their right mind would have conceived it? Much as I'd love to never hear anything from either candidate again, I'm more concerned with the aftermath of the election. Whoever gets into the Oval Office will be burdened with scandals and suspicions, and will inherit a political class in chaos and a deeply divided, cynical, and angry electorate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattern Ghost Posted November 3, 2016 Report Share Posted November 3, 2016 They kind of predicted it in an episode of Black Mirror. Waldo was a bit more respectable though. Lucius 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NuSoardGraphite Posted November 3, 2016 Report Share Posted November 3, 2016 You might want to file this under conspiracy theories but heres a guy who claims to be part of a coalition of intelligence agency people who are responsible for leaking the Podesta emails to Wikileaks. His credentials are legit. He is former Intelligence. https://youtu.be/ov5kvWSz5LM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DasBroot Posted November 3, 2016 Report Share Posted November 3, 2016 The Cubs won the World Series so I think Giant Meteor might not be out of this race yet. aylwin13, Lord Liaden and Hermit 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted November 3, 2016 Report Share Posted November 3, 2016 IMHO this thread could use an emotional change of tone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted November 3, 2016 Report Share Posted November 3, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted November 3, 2016 Report Share Posted November 3, 2016 Iuz the Evil 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megaplayboy Posted November 4, 2016 Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 Assuming Clinton wins, there's a reckoning coming for Russia over all this hacking stuff. They are headed for permanent decline as a great power, and antagonizing the US and Western Europe in a gambit to get a Putin friendly president elected was a terrible move. IF it fails. Iuz the Evil 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted November 4, 2016 Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 From an IT perspective, I'm hoping that all the Putin shenanigans from this election will get .gov and .biz people off their butts to really do something about cybersecurity. THE RUSSIANS ARE LITERALLY IN YOUR BASE, PEOPLE. Not optimistic though. Meanwhile, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hermit Posted November 4, 2016 Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 Tennessee's early voting went through the roof and broke records. Partly the state (Wisely I think) encouraged it to help cut down on traffic and pressure on Nov 8. But I suspect many early voters want it over and done with! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattern Ghost Posted November 4, 2016 Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 Just filled out our ballots. I went ahead and wrote in Giant Meteor. DasBroot and Hermit 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted November 5, 2016 Report Share Posted November 5, 2016 Assuming Clinton wins, there's a reckoning coming for Russia over all this hacking stuff. They are headed for permanent decline as a great power, and antagonizing the US and Western Europe in a gambit to get a Putin friendly president elected was a terrible move. IF it fails. I've been reading some news commentary asserting that Hillary Clinton had been pushing a tough stand against Vladimir Putin since before her term as Secretary of State. Putin anticipated hard-line positions toward his regime if she took the Oval Office; from his perspective he probably thought he had nothing to lose. Russia's numerous provocative moves may be intended to compel the West to keep treating Russia as a great power. Whether it is or not, it's good for his domestic support (and probably his ego) for Putin to keep making a show of Russia's international influence. Having a lot of nuclear weapons makes it practically impossible to either ignore or coerce Putin and Russia. But it's also worth remembering that Russians are genuinely concerned about the expansion of NATO and other Western coalitions into what Russia traditionally considers its sphere of influence, in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. We all know how traumatized American society was by a very few relatively minor foreign terrorist attacks on its soil. Try to imagine the mindset of a people who have been repeatedly invaded for centuries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger Posted November 5, 2016 Report Share Posted November 5, 2016 I expect Clinton to give a lot of talk on going after Russia, but not all that much action in the end. For better or worse, our side is probably more prone to blink on something like this. Hopefully, the American powers that be will get a rudimentary desire for cybersecurity from all these messes, it is really all we can do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megaplayboy Posted November 5, 2016 Report Share Posted November 5, 2016 They are incredibly dependent upon oil and gas export, and the sanctions and low oil prices are crippling their economy. Russia's cash reserves run out next year, and if the oil market doesn't recover, Putin may face a deeply unhappy electorate in 2018. Anything we can do to make life more difficult for him is to be seriously considered, imo. DasBroot 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger Posted November 5, 2016 Report Share Posted November 5, 2016 I wouldn't be against, but I have serious doubts anything realistically damaging would be done. I have become dubious about sanctions. Although Russia might be a bit more prone than the usual nation we have done to in the past ( mostly Mid East dictatorships who apparently didn't give a #### about the miseries of their people, in Russia you do have to answer to the people a little bit.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted November 5, 2016 Report Share Posted November 5, 2016 I've read more than one analyst suggest that Russia's provocative military moves are calculated to, among other things, make other nations think twice about the potential consequences of leveling economic sanctions against Russia. It's possible to push Putin to the point where he figures he has less to lose from war than from peace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
womble Posted November 5, 2016 Report Share Posted November 5, 2016 I wouldn't be against, but I have serious doubts anything realistically damaging would be done. I have become dubious about sanctions. Although Russia might be a bit more prone than the usual nation we have done to in the past ( mostly Mid East dictatorships who apparently didn't give a #### about the miseries of their people, in Russia you do have to answer to the people a little bit.) Sanction use is complicated. "We" don't want to put the economic strong-arm on the poor downtrodden Russkies who are only reacting badly to the changing world because the pretty much 100% Putin-controlled Russian media is feeding them propaganda and fantasy. The Kleptocrats who Putin might need to consider (fewer in number and more loyal nowadays than they once were, thanks to the good old successors of the KGB) can keep soaking the public purse for a good while yet. Your average Russian is no naif with tricolours in their eyes, but they're barely one generation out of 100% totalitarianism, (which didn't arise out of any long tradition of parliamentary democracy) and stereotypical fatalism will make any backlash against the gangsters who stole the benefits of Russia's vast natural resources slow to arise. Without that backlash, though, I'd say you barely have to consider the actual opinions of the Russian People, since they are, effectively, the opinions of the propaganda organs which serve the incumbent kleptocracy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
薔薇語 Posted November 5, 2016 Report Share Posted November 5, 2016 They are incredibly dependent upon oil and gas export, and the sanctions and low oil prices are crippling their economy. Russia's cash reserves run out next year, and if the oil market doesn't recover, Putin may face a deeply unhappy electorate in 2018. Anything we can do to make life more difficult for him is to be seriously considered, imo. "How dare the Russians interfere with our political process! Let's interfere with theirs!" How about we just secure our IT centers, stop rigging what should be fair and open processes, and generally not be terrible to each other, and do our darndest to not get in a war with anyone - especially not Russia (or China!). I voted already with a mail-in-ballot. Since I no longer live in my homestate, I felt a little weird voting on some local issues but did so in large part. Not being up to date with some of the candidates, my ballot was largely Gold with a couple blue marks for people that I do know of and think are okay (and because in at least one case the gold candidate was terrible). Soar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armitage Posted November 5, 2016 Report Share Posted November 5, 2016 So it begins... A man wearing a Donald Trump shirt and carrying a weapon stood outside a voting location in Loudoun County, Virginia, on Friday. Authorities in the nation’s richest county are apparently OK with that. “I had my 9-year-old son with me. I felt intimidated,” Cotti said. “And I had to explain to my 9-year-old why a man with a 357 magnum is standing outside the polling station.”Cotti said the man offered her a Republican sample ballot, which she declined.“He’s like, ‘Who are you going to vote for, crooked Hillary?’ And I was like, that’s really none of your business,” Cotti said, adding that the man was standing in the sidewalk outside of the office when they left and blocking their path. Loudoun County Republican Committee Chairman Will Estrada told HuffPost that the man was a former law enforcement official and veteran with a concealed carry permit.“’We don’t want to startle anyone,’” Estrada said he told him. “He felt really bad, he pulled his T-shirt over it, and I think everything was fine after that.” They don't want to startle anyone. Intimidate, yes. Startle, no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DasBroot Posted November 5, 2016 Report Share Posted November 5, 2016 It' not illegal to lie to these people. I would have said "Of course not. Donald Trump all the way." and then voted for whoever I wanted. It's not always the best idea to agree with lunatics you meet but it often is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattern Ghost Posted November 5, 2016 Report Share Posted November 5, 2016 I'd have told him to shut up and get the f* out of my way. But I'm cantankerous. Starlord 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 Weapons aside, handing out Republican sample ballots counts as electioneering here, which is flatly illegal within 100 yards of a polling place. Nolgroth 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 I'd have told him to shut up and get the f* out of my way. But I'm cantankerous. Always a chance a do something stupid. My first impulse to threats is to defy said threat (though sometimes wise to do it through unrecognizable means) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DasBroot Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 Always a chance a do something stupid. My first impulse to threats is to defy said threat (though sometimes wise to do it through unrecognizable means) That's always been my first impulse as well - but being a father of two does a pretty good job of curbing it. Do I really want to leave my wife with two children under five for taking a shortcut through an area I knew I shouldn't or not giving up a seat on the bus (or even my wallet)? Unrecognizable is where it's at these days - no more defiance, just pure revenge. Saying "It's none of your business" to an armed stranger with your 9 year old present is more than brave enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattern Ghost Posted November 6, 2016 Report Share Posted November 6, 2016 Iuz the Evil 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.