Jump to content

[Police brutality] American injustice, yet again.


Ragitsu

Recommended Posts

Look, I don't care for butt crack fashion, whether you're a plumber or not...

but it doesn't justify lighting some poor SOB up and leaving him to die.

 

Yes, I'm stating the obvious, but apparently somehow the obvious is going over many Law Enforcement departments' collective heads

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geeze. Perhaps it is a good thing I left the US after all. Seriously, corrupt and Killer cops are a bit too much. I am fortunate enough that I don't have to be involved in the 24 hour news cycle of hearing about these and yet I still learn about probably one corruption or murder case a day. Sad state of affairs. 

 

La Rose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how does elected mayor Betty McCray fit into this small town melodrama?

I've been trying to figure that out, but it looks hinky all around.  I suspect the whole city hall could just be turned into a jail and they could let everyone keep their original offices, from mayor to council to police to city attorney.  It will make an interesting news item when someone figures it all out, but I expect it will be off the radar by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a discussion of the Baltimore protests and riots on "On Point" this morning.   Funny how many excuses one panelist in particular was making for the high school rioters.

 

It was all the Police Departments fault, because they did not "Engage with the youths" at the schools during the day, and then when they gathered for ALLEGEDLY a "Purge."  The police showed up in riot gear.  

 

And another was basically accusing the police department of lying in its statements that they had "Credible Threats" of gang members allying to attack police and of the "Purge" gathering.     

 

He said that they (his group of community leaders) had "Signed Statements" from the Gang Leaders that they were NOT up to such things.  

 

 

I'm Sorry, GANG MEMBERS treated as honest citizens?  Rational Actors and Honest Negotiators?   

 

I could well be out to lunch on this, but GANG MEMBERS are criminals.   Criminals are NOT honest, nearly by definition.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd put more stock in the words of Baltimore police officers if Freddy Grey had not mysteriously died on their watch.  Fine when they arrested him and, unless I'm greatly mistaken, managed to sustain a severe spinal injury on the way to lock up and as a result, he died.  Perhaps Baltimore police should put more work into investigating that, instead of pointing fingers at other people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd put more stock in the words of Baltimore police officers if Freddy Grey had not mysteriously died on their watch.  Fine when they arrested him and, unless I'm greatly mistaken, managed to sustain a severe spinal injury on the way to lock up and as a result, he died.  Perhaps Baltimore police should put more work into investigating that, instead of pointing fingers at other people.

Sounds like they ARE investigating...   

 

Oh, and the Mayor said iirc two days ago that(basically, not exact words) they "are leaving room for the people who feel the need to destroy to destroy stuff."

 

Since then she has said she would never have said anything like that, but she was on camera, so...

 

I wonder, does that make the City liable for the damages they declined to stop?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you think gang members are dishonest, you should see the baltimore PD. the gang members live here, and have an investment in a community that includes their families and their (illicit) businesses. They don't benefit from a broken city any more than the rest of us.

 

 

They may well be FUBAR, but by definition, Street gangs are Criminals.   It is at least possible that a Police officer is NOT a criminal, despite what Mick Jagger sang, and the obvious impression many have gotten from recent events. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Atlantic: Rough Rides and the Challenges of Improving Police Culture

 

Really makes me sick that this is a thing.

According to "Breaking Blue" which is a very interesting read, here in Spokane, it used to be common for suspects to "Fall Down" and injure themselves in the elevator to the upper floor holding cells.  This was, iirc early 70s. 

 

Reading the article I had a few thoughts.  

 

The pursuit of him, after he "Locked eyes with an officer then ran" is actually constitutionally supported, if I correctly recall my Con-Law class.   Flight on sighting officers is, according to the Supreme Court, grounds for a stop. 

 

I have seen what purports to be a rap sheet for Gray.  IF it is correct, he may well have been recognized by the officers as a known drug dealer.  I have seen comments that this record makes him not worthy of protest, let alone riots.    I DISAGREE intensely, as NONE of the crimes are Capital offenses.  Even if they were, it looks an awful lot lik

 

His possession of a knife could mean a weapon, could mean a tiny pocket knife, I don't know.  

 

Off topic:  I know when a Transient was booked in front of me for trespassing, the officer went through his belongings.  There were about 5 different cheap pocket knives tucked away in rolled up socks and other hiding places. 

 

My first thought about the injury to Gray was a flashback to the death(murder) of the Commissar in "Red Storm Rising."   Slam the base of his skull down on a hard edge...

 

The Damage to his trachea and reports that an officer kneeled on his throat makes that seem the more likely cause/moment of injury. 

 

 I have seen comments that Gray's alleged record makes him not worthy of protest, let alone riots.    I DISAGREE intensely, as NONE of the crimes are Capital offenses.  Even if they were, it looks an awful lot like Excessive force, Police Brutality, or even extra-judicial killing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found a quote about what the Mayor said

 

 “It’s a very delicate balancing act, because, while we tried to make sure that they were protected from the cars and the other things that were going on, we also gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well.”

 

 

My reaction was basically WTF???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The chief of police, asked about the lack of violent response (sorry, "escalation of force") by the riot police, said "there were 13, 14, and 15 year-old kids out there, do you want us to shoot them?" He has a point. Also, escalation of force almost never leads to de-escalation of conflict. It feels reckless and unjust, but waiting it out was a smarter move. Doing what they did very likely saved lives and property and let tonight be a quiet night in my city. If the guys with the truncheons are not beating people, trust that they have good reason to do so. Truncheons love working, and it is hard to hold them at your side without finding something to hit with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy Crap. I'm going to call the cops here in Portland and take them out for a drink. 1) The officers I've met and encountered have been great and 2) I may just want to get on their good side.

 

Been living in Portland for 3 years now and yesterday afternoon while waiting for the streetcar to take me home from grocery shopping I saw a fight between two homeless (maybe not homeless, but non-affluent white gentlemen in their late 50's or really hard lives) fellows. Mostly shouting and shoving and then LOTS of shouting and flipping of birds. 

 

Three cop cars arrived to deal with it when they were called. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the hell?

 

Let me explain.  He was not guilty of manslaughter because the crime of manslaughter requires that you accidentally kill someone through reckless behaviour.  Since his behaviour was deliberate, he was not guilty of manslaughter.  His acquittal is because the prosecutor lowballed the charge below what the facts of the case would support.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me explain. He was not guilty of manslaughter because the crime of manslaughter requires that you accidentally kill someone through reckless behaviour. Since his behaviour was deliberate, he was not guilty of manslaughter. His acquittal is because the prosecutor lowballed the charge below what the facts of the case would support.

God bless America. Land of the Free roaming murdering cops. Land where cops get off because when charged with what they did, the judge says its too harsh. When charged with less, they get off because they are more guilty.

 

La Rose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A: rioting thugs are rioting thugs. Treat them identically.

 

B: there is one difference besides race. Assinine athletic supporter riots are not politically motivated and are not likely to continue or spread.

 

Just as the definition of terrorism has qualifiers based on intent...

 

 

Hmm, intended to bring about political change. Does that make the Baltimore rioters terrorists?

 

 

The protests are justified, about real problems. The riots, I have assumed were anarchists and hooligans using an excuse to cause chaos and violence.

 

But if we take their claims as to cause at face value...

 

 

Technicalities in legal definitions are part of why law does NOT equal justice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...