Jump to content

Marvel Cinematic Universe, Phase Three and BEYOOOOONND


Bazza

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

3 hours ago, Bazza said:

Bro Thor...was stupid. 

 

2 hours ago, zslane said:

I completely understand where you're coming from, Bazza.

 

Sure, as just about anyone would, I like a bit of humor in my action movies. It helps keep them from becoming too grim. But when the humor strays into the realm of parody, I start to lose interest (and respect, for the characters). It's why I never warmed up to Venture Brothers, Batman: The Brave and the Bold, and am struggling a little with the new Harley Quinn cartoon. Fat Thor felt more like parody to me than simple humor.

 

To be clear, Thor is my favorite comic-book superhero, and I absolutely hate the direction Marvel Studios took him. But from the perspective of trying to sell entertainment to an audience, I can't fault their decision. MCU Thor had become static, not growing as a character, and was among the less popular MCU heroes. Chris Hemsworth is a very talented comic actor, so using that talent to add to Thor's appeal made sense. With Thor: Ragnarok and Avengers: Infinity War they essentially turned Thor into Marvel Comics' Hercules, a lovable goof who also happens to be an awesome badass. The response of moviegoers -- as opposed to longtime comics fans -- to that change was strongly positive.

 

In Avengers: Endgame they turned Thor full-on Volstagg (comic version). That actually was similar to a development from the run of Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy comic -- the 31st Century version, I mean. And as much as I loathed seeing him like that, as part of MCU Thor's character arc it made sense. Over the course of the MCU's rollout Thor lost everything. He lost his lover. He lost his whole family. He lost all his closest friends. He lost his home. He lost the weapon that was like part of him. He failed to protect his people, and lost half of them. Through all of that he kept moving forward, refusing to give up. What finally broke him was what he saw as his failure to save half the people in the Universe.

 

Anyone with experience of depression and/or PTSD can grasp how Thor became what he is in Endgame. But in the end he found the help he needed to be a hero again, and that is an inspiring development. (Too little too late for my liking, but still.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Lord Liaden said:

 

 

To be clear, Thor is my favorite comic-book superhero, and I absolutely hate the direction Marvel Studios took him. But from the perspective of trying to sell entertainment to an audience, I can't fault their decision. MCU Thor had become static, not growing as a character, and was among the less popular MCU heroes. Chris Hemsworth is a very talented comic actor, so using that talent to add to Thor's appeal made sense. With Thor: Ragnarok and Avengers: Infinity War they essentially turned Thor into Marvel Comics' Hercules, a lovable goof who also happens to be an awesome badass. The response of moviegoers -- as opposed to longtime comics fans -- to that change was strongly positive.

 

In Avengers: Endgame they turned Thor full-on Volstagg (comic version). That actually was similar to a development from the run of Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy comic -- the 31st Century version, I mean. And as much as I loathed seeing him like that, as part of MCU Thor's character arc it made sense. Over the course of the MCU's rollout Thor lost everything. He lost his lover. He lost his whole family. He lost all his closest friends. He lost his home. He lost the weapon that was like part of him. He failed to protect his people, and lost half of them. Through all of that he kept moving forward, refusing to give up. What finally broke him was what he saw as his failure to save half the people in the Universe.

 

Anyone with experience of depression and/or PTSD can grasp how Thor became what he is in Endgame. But in the end he found the help he needed to be a hero again, and that is an inspiring development. (Too little too late for my liking, but still.)

 

I think there was a different way they could have gone to shake up the character if they thought his appeal was growing stale.

 

Just look at what happened in the comics when the Watcher whispered to him just exactly how he was unworthy.

 

Thor got to go through the whole redemption arc without all the fat jokes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree 100% with archer here. You don't have to make a mockery of the Thor character in order to put him through another redemption arc. I know that the lighter, more humorous tone of Thor: Ragnorak was well-received, but if "Fat Thor would be great!" was what Feige took away from that, then I think it's one of those rare cases where he simply got it wrong. Listening to your audience is a good thing; pandering to the Big Lebowski fans among them is...IMO...not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you recall, in Ragnarok Thor saved his people but lost Asgard. Odin told him Asgard was the people. He was settling into the role of being their leader when Thanos came along and killed who knows how many Asgardians. Before Thanos ever snapped his fingers. Going into Infinity War, Thor was already damaged by that loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, plus every other loss I listed, before the snap. It's really a testament to Thor's character that he hadn't already been overwhelmed by grief.

 

They might have gone another route to his redemption, and I selfishly wish they had, but I'm not sure what that could have been. The movies had already used depowering him. Story-wise I think "fat Thor" was a fair choice, in that whatever else was taken from him, Thor remained this physically perfect, godlike man. Stripping him of that -- or more accurately, burying it under fat -- was the final step in stripping away who he had been. From there the only directions, dramatically, were death or renewal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I LOVE Thor.  Particularly Shakespearean serious Thor.

 

However, given EVERYTHING he has gone through in the MCU, I am still ok with with his overall character arc and how he has character has transformed.  He leaned heavily into the ridiculous in Thor: Ragnarok but I think he still came out ok.  I say 'THEE NAY' to all those who disapprove.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Infinity War I thought they struck a solid, acceptable balance between the comical and the dramatic in Thor. What they did with him in Endgame was one big factor in my not wanting to watch that movie a second time. I had to rewatch some Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes to wash out the taste of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Lord Liaden said:

but I'm not sure what that could have been.

 

LL, I know you have a highly functioning imagination and a prodigious intellect to go with it, which is why I am surprised you gave up so easily there. Farcical behavior is but one reaction to profound loss, and I'd argue it is the least dramatically compelling--in the context of cinema--because it undercuts the tragedy/suffering with persistent bathos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, zslane said:

 

LL, I know you have a highly functioning imagination and a prodigious intellect to go with it, which is why I am surprised you gave up so easily there. Farcical behavior is but one reaction to profound loss, and I'd argue it is the least dramatically compelling--in the context of cinema--because it undercuts the tragedy/suffering with persistent bathos.

 

First, implied compliment gratefully accepted. 😊

 

Second, just to reiterate, I really didn't like that they took Thor in the direction of profound depression, with its attendant consequences. But since they did, drama, in practical terms, weighs in favor of them adding the comical elements. Depressed Thor, with or without the fat, would be a figure of pity without some comic relief, which would be likely to have depressed and distressed the audience. Being able to laugh at something inherently makes it easier to bear. Lord knows there's more than enough downer in Endgame. Thor the buffoon greatly annoyed me, but whiny Thor would have been even worse.

 

Moreover, when you look at the movie as a whole, the other Avengers pretty much cover the rest of the spectrum for how people cope with grief and loss. Natasha throws herself into her work of leading the remaining Avengers. Clint turns his rage and pain outward, trying to exhaust it in violence. Steve renounces fighting altogether, focusing on helping others come to terms with their own losses. Bruce gains incentive to resolve his long-standing issues and find peace within himself. Tony withdraws altogether to create a safe little bubble for himself and his family. Rocket uses sarcasm to mask the loss of the only people he considered family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thor could have spent his days building an Asgardian-style "fortress of solitude" for himself somewhere in Scandanavia. I would have preferred a Thor single-mindedly obsessed with building some giant structure in homage to his lost people and lost realm than a Thor wallowing in pity and serving as the focal point for farce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Dr. MID-Nite said:

I enjoyed the first two episodes of Wandavision. It's a slow burn, but it teases just enough to have you wanting more. There's heavy hints at "devilish" involvement, but that could possibly be a red herring.

 

I found I was watching it more because I knew there must be something more going on than for the half hour sitcom.  I think this could easily get annoying if drawn out too far, but even the second episode threw in

Spoiler

those "a flash of colour" scenes, and the shift to colour at the very end of the second episode.

 

So I'll give it a bit more time to develop.  Besides, my 18 yo son is very excited by the show, starting with the closing of the first episode.  Even if it turns out pretty flat, I've wasted time watching worse TV.

 

13 hours ago, Lord Liaden said:

 

First, implied compliment gratefully accepted. 😊

 

Second, just to reiterate, I really didn't like that they took Thor in the direction of profound depression, with its attendant consequences. But since they did, drama, in practical terms, weighs in favor of them adding the comical elements. Depressed Thor, with or without the fat, would be a figure of pity without some comic relief, which would be likely to have depressed and distressed the audience. Being able to laugh at something inherently makes it easier to bear. Lord knows there's more than enough downer in Endgame. Thor the buffoon greatly annoyed me, but whiny Thor would have been even worse.

 

Moreover, when you look at the movie as a whole, the other Avengers pretty much cover the rest of the spectrum for how people cope with grief and loss. Natasha throws herself into her work of leading the remaining Avengers. Clint turns his rage and pain outward, trying to exhaust it in violence. Steve renounces fighting altogether, focusing on helping others come to terms with their own losses. Bruce gains incentive to resolve his long-standing issues and find peace within himself. Tony withdraws altogether to create a safe little bubble for himself and his family. Rocket uses sarcasm to mask the loss of the only people he considered family.

 

While I was not a big fan of "fat Thor", I really liked the chat with his mother, particularly when he moved to the lowest point of his self-pity and held out his hand for the Mjolnir he knew would not respond because he was no longer worthy, so he could say "See, Mom - I am an irredeemable failure".  And the clear, speechless shock when Mjolnir landed in his hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...