Jump to content

Order of the Stick


Rapier

Recommended Posts

Re: Order of the Stick

 

Just a counterpoint' date=' as much as I would deplore such an act in the real world or anything resembling it, in a world where dragons are Color Coded For Your Convenience and some colors are Always Chaotic Evil, in an objective and verifiable sense, then wouldn't ridding the world of a large number of such dragons be a Good-aligned act?

 

In a D&D Morality world, I would agree with you. That's the premise the characters operate under. I'm uncertain whether that is the intent in OoTS. Although it certainly was at the outset, the strip has evolved to a much more three dimensional fictional universe than the D&D satire it started out as.

 

I bet the Paladin they had all that trouble with would think it was a Good act!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

Just a counterpoint' date=' as much as I would deplore such an act in the real world or anything resembling it, in a world where dragons are Color Coded For Your Convenience and some colors are Always Chaotic Evil, in an objective and verifiable sense, then wouldn't ridding the world of a large number of such dragons be a Good-aligned act?

 

Perhaps. But is it still a Good-aligned act if one takes Evil, sadistic glee in performing it? V's enjoying himself way too much to be a truly Good act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

Just a counterpoint' date=' as much as I would deplore such an act in the real world or anything resembling it, in a world where dragons are Color Coded For Your Convenience and some colors are Always Chaotic Evil, in an objective and verifiable sense, then wouldn't ridding the world of a large number of such dragons be a Good-aligned act?

 

A 3.5 fan would have to weigh in on this, but IIRC the rule has always been that racial alignments are general, with specific exceptions. Drzzt the Drow can be Chaotic Good, even if the alignment of his Race is Chaotic Evil. Considering the number of dragons V just killed, chances are high that at least a few were non-Evil, especially considering the cross breeds. Even in D&D morality, killing a Good person because he has an Evil relative is an Evil act.

 

Also, Rich is very fond of exploring the range of personalities within an alignment, and his Goblin society (explored in one of the books) looked Neutral verging on Good; I'd be very surprised if he didn't allow for good aligned Black dragons in his world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

A 3.5 fan would have to weigh in on this, but IIRC the rule has always been that racial alignments are general, with specific exceptions. Drzzt the Drow can be Chaotic Good, even if the alignment of his Race is Chaotic Evil. Considering the number of dragons V just killed, chances are high that at least a few were non-Evil, especially considering the cross breeds. Even in D&D morality, killing a Good person because he has an Evil relative is an Evil act.

 

Also, Rich is very fond of exploring the range of personalities within an alignment, and his Goblin society (explored in one of the books) looked Neutral verging on Good; I'd be very surprised if he didn't allow for good aligned Black dragons in his world.

 

Not to mention that spell executed dragons still in the egg who were no threat to anyone at that time. The potential to choose either Good/Neutral/Evil was taken away from them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

Just a counterpoint' date=' as much as I would deplore such an act in the real world or anything resembling it, in a world where dragons are Color Coded For Your Convenience and some colors are Always Chaotic Evil, in an objective and verifiable sense, then wouldn't ridding the world of a large number of such dragons be a Good-aligned act?

 

No. Berlew is using 3.0 rules, and not only did they connect Good with "respect for life" so that you couldn't kill people just for being Evil and maintain a Good alignment yourself, but under those rules flesh and blood species were not absolutely tied to any alignment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

No. Berlew is using 3.0 rules' date=' and not only did they connect Good with "respect for life" so that you couldn't kill people just for being Evil and maintain a Good alignment yourself, but under those rules flesh and blood species were not absolutely tied to any alignment.[/quote']

No, they upgraded to 3.5 WAY early in the series. In the first storyline

 

 

And as has been mentioned before, Killing an entire family like that is evil. V has been lost to us. At least for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

Evil is pink?

 

Even if Vaarsuvius is evil that does not preclude being in the Order of the Stick nor being a useful member. Remember Belkar. That ominous suggestion "Tear down creation just to see if you can" aside, Vaarsuvius and at least some (two out of three) of her "new friends" will be motivated to stop the archlich.

 

Lucius Alexander

 

The palindromedary wonders if we'll ever see a good character in the Linear Guild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

IIRC' date=' he comments that he would never associate with scum like the Linear Guild, save that it brought him closer to the halfling who killed his father.[/quote']

 

I remember that.

 

I'll agree that's a strong indication for being non-evil - although I'm sure it's quite possible for some evil beings to regard others as "scum." Nothing Inigo did was evil, unless one counts revenge as an evil motive - and one could easily point out the difference between wanting to kill a killer, and the kind of obviously unjust revenge of the dragon wanting to kill the killer's family.

 

But what convinces me is remembering that Nale deliberately tries to make the Linear Guild the "evil opposite" of the Order of the Stick. Belkar being definitely evil, Nale might have opposed him with someone good. He couldn't have been VERY good though, if he was going along with the Linear Guild's plans of kidnapping and ambush.

 

So I guess my question should be - will we see a good member of the Linear Guild who actually sticks around for more than one scene?

 

 

Regarding Vaarsuvius' act - "Familicide" in this case is not, strictly speaking, revenge. The intention seems to be to put a final and definite end to the cycle of revenge, in order to protect the family. Not, mind you, that such an excessive measure is justified. I think "Lets kill them all, just in case" thinking counts as evil.

 

Lucius Alexander

 

The palindromedary wonders if Chaotic Evil Clerics have to take unholy disorders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

We could use the Dragonlance D&D series to make a judgment about V's alignment. In that series "good" magic-users generally wore white, "neutral" generally wore red and "evil" generally wore black. V has, up until now, worn red (denoting neutral) but after the indwelling of the three evil magic users his robes have gone to black. There is also the case of the vampire-like fangs that V has grown, generally not a "goodness and light" characteristic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

I thought D&D was the epitome of "Winner defines Good?" It's kinda hard-coded into the game; you have to hack the Hack to avoid it.

 

Familicide has that whiff of a spell greenlit by the GM who didn't realize just how extensive it's effects could be on a long-lived species like dragons. This spells reach and breadth makes me think the undead dragonhead might be only one or two generations from Tiamat or some god level creature. V may have just bitten off more than he can chew, even Delta V.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

We could use the Dragonlance D&D series to make a judgment about V's alignment. In that series "good" magic-users generally wore white' date=' "neutral" generally wore red and "evil" generally wore black. V has, up until now, worn red (denoting neutral) but after the indwelling of the three evil magic users his robes have gone to black. There is also the case of the vampire-like fangs that V has grown, generally not a "goodness and light" characteristic.[/quote']

 

"I See A Red Robe And I Want To Paint It Black"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Order of the Stick

 

I agree what V's action would be evil in any realistic universe--I'm not arguing that *I* think it's a good thing to do. Indeed' date=' things like this point out the limitations of the "standard D&D model".[/quote']

It was a necromancy spell, and I believe all of those are Evil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...